A presidential spokesperson said that they might have used microwaves to spy on Trump and the left and the MSM are trending that she is a fool for saying this. I am tired of having to take up for Trump and his spokesmen. I don’t like them. Why does the media have to lie about everything? About things they don’t know about? Microwaves have been used in information gathering and so have lasers so these people are mocking her and they didn’t even look it up. What is she supposed to brief you on a secret program so you can freak out on that too?
Facebook is supposed to be protecting the world from fake news but when the fake news comes from CNBC they swallow it hook line and sinker. I was in the military in electronic warfare and I can tell you it is entirely possible and has been done routinely.
Microwave eavesdropping has a long and clandestine history. And there’s an odd connection between music and microwave eavesdropping. Mention the name Leon Theremin and many people will immediately think of the musical instrument bearing his name. Born Lev Sergeyevich Termen, his contributions to the former Soviet Union spanned the history of the Soviet Union from the original Bolshevik Revolution to the collapse of the USSR.
Termen was a mathematics prodigy who was drawn into the emerging field of electronics. Termen came across the basic principle for one of the first electronic musical instruments while working on television. The theremin (Termen called it an “etherophone”) produced music with modulated static. Players used two antennae, one for pitch and one for volume, producing musical tones by waving their hands around the antennae. Skilled musicians reportedly could recreate the sounds of many existing instruments.
The more people and the media talk about Trump, the less time they have to talk about Fukashima. The half life of a president is four years. The half life of strontium is forever as far as we are concerned. Chernobyl is not even a close comparison and at least they did something to contain that and it wasn’t next to the sea. These people have no plan to deal with this. Bags of radio active waste are piled high and the near by hill sides are covered with tanks full of highly radio active water. Trump can’t compare to this nightmare and it is surely a scheme to lower the population of the earth if the leaders of the world and the media continue to ignore this global issue that is far more important than warming temps.
Bill Maher and Milo Yiannopoulos had their controversial showdown on HBO’s Real Time on Friday night, though there were fewer sparks than some had expected.The liberal talk show host and conservative Breitbart editor tried to find common ground during an 11-minute discussion (full video below), which made national headlines earlier this week after previously scheduled Real Time guest The Intercept co-founder Jeremy Scahill dropped out of the show to protest Yiannopoulos’ booking.Maher and Yiannopoulos seemed to agree most when it came to the importance of comedy in general.“The reason [liberals] want to police humor is they can’t control it — because the one thing all authoritarians hate is the sound of laughter,” Yiannopoulos said.“And also because when people laugh they know it’s true,” Maher agreed. “… You are so helped by the fact that liberals always take the bait.”“Nothing annoys people like the truth,” Yiannopoulos concurred. “Policing humor for racism and sexism is utterly wrongheaded. Not because normally it’s not there, but because that’s how we build bridges and not how we break them.”
Here is the part I don’t get
“Yet Yiannopoulos made blatant sexist comments during the interview, criticizing Amy Schumer and Sarah Silverman as people who “used to be funny before they contracted feminism.”
How is that Sexist? Because feminism is political and not some kind of thing that all women share. To make a comment about all women would be sexist since they are not monolithic and that would be stereotyping.
Source: Milo Yiannopoulos spars with Bill Maher, attacks female comics
Debate still surrounds Hutton’s conclusion that Kelly committed suicide. The inquiry found that Kelly died after cutting an artery, had taken an overdose of painkillers and had heart disease which left his arteries “significantly narrowed”. Thus, said experts, less blood loss may have killed the scientist than that needed to kill a healthy man.
Among those who have called for an inquest or have doubts it was a suicide are former Tory leader Michael Howard, and Liberal Democrat minister Norman Baker, who wrote a book saying Kelly was most likely murdered.
A group of doctors say Hutton’s findings should be discarded and a new inquest held. Dr Stephen Frost said: “We have lots of evidence … No coroner in the land would reach a verdict of suicide as Lord Hutton did.”
Experts in forensic pathology point out the skeptics may be expert in their own fields, but not in the science of establishing the cause of death.
Hutton has kept silent since his report, breaking it only to write a letter denouncing the conspiracy theorists. Hutton’s conclusion is supported by the available facts and experts: “At no time … was there any suggestion from any counsel for the interested parties or in any of the extensive media coverage that any of the police officers engaged in investigating Dr Kelly’s death or any of the medical or scientific witnesses was involved in any sort of cover-up or plot to make a murder appear like a suicide.”
Dyke claimed that: “Some of Dr Kelly’s wider family don’t believe it’s suicide.”
But the Conservative-led government has said the evidence for suicide is so compelling there is no need for a fresh hearing.
Source: Dr David Kelly: 10 years on, death of scientist remains unresolved for some | Politics | The Guardian
One of the persistent strands in U.S. political life is a cultish extremism that approaches fascism. This was given expression and reinforced during the two terms of Barack Obama. “I believe in American exceptionalism with every fiber of my being,” said Obama, who expanded the United States’ favorite military pastime: bombing and death squads (“special operations”) as no other president has done since the Cold War.According to a Council on Foreign Relations survey, in 2016 alone Obama dropped 26,171 bombs. That is 72 bombs every day. He bombed the poorest people on earth, in Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, Iraq, Pakistan.Every Tuesday — reported the New York Times — he personally selected those who would be murdered by mostly hellfire missiles fired from drones. Weddings, funerals, shepherds were attacked, along with those attempting to collect the body parts festooning the “terrorist target.” A leading Republican senator, Lindsey Graham, estimated, approvingly, that Obama’s drones killed 4,700 people. “Sometimes you hit innocent people and I hate that,” he said, “but we’ve taken out some very senior members of Al Qaeda.”Like the fascism of the 1930s, big lies are delivered with the precision of a metronome, thanks to an omnipresent media whose description now fits that of the Nuremberg prosecutor: “Before each major aggression, with some few exceptions based on expediency, they initiated a press campaign calculated to weaken their victims and to prepare the German people psychologically … In the propaganda system … it was the daily press and the radio that were the most important weapons.”Take the catastrophe in Libya. In 2011, Obama said Libyan president Muammar Gaddafi was planning “genocide” against his own people. “We knew … that if we waited one more day, Benghazi, a city the size of Charlotte, could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.”
This was the known lie of Islamist militias facing defeat by Libyan government forces. It became the media story and NATO — led by Obama and Hillary Clinton — launched 9,700 “strike sorties” against Libya, of which more than a third were aimed at civilian targets. Uranium warheads were used; the cities of Misurata and Sirte were carpet-bombed. The Red Cross identified mass graves, and UNICEF reported that “most (of the children killed) were under the age of ten.”
Under Obama, the U.S. extended secret “special forces” operations to 138 countries, or 70 percent of the world’s population. The first African-American president launched what amounted to a full-scale invasion of Africa. Reminiscent of the “Scramble for Africa” in the late 19th century, the U.S. African Command has built a network of supplicants among collaborative African regimes eager for U.S. bribes and armaments. Africom’s “soldier to soldier” doctrine embeds U.S. officers at every level of command from general to warrant officer. Only pith helmets are missing.
Source: The Issue Is Not Trump, It’s Us | Opinion | teleSUR English
I came to vent for a moment about how annoyed I am by these television activists. They don’t bother to check or cross reference any facts, they don’t even research the actual issues they are so passionately supporting and or condemning. They are swallowing and spewing the same triple regurgitated, human centipede-style shit that cable feeds them. And they would like to spray it in your face too, and should you choose not to eat from their putrid bowl, then you are immediately a bigot, racist, etc. I am not a “Trump supporter” (said in my most sarcastic tone). I simply believe that nobody running for or elected president is gonna do a goddamn thing in favor of the American people. Do these fools really believe that their “party” is sitting up there in DC actually trying to make a positive difference? The hypocrisy of the people protesting the stupid ban (when it’s been done many times before, even by their hallowed Obomber) makes me roll my eyes so far back I’ve got a fucking migraine. If these righteous plebs would put a quarter ounce of their energy into an issue that matters (like the Federal Reserve/ fractional reserve banking maybe) they could really change the world and the way people think. Okay. End rant.
Facial recognition is one of the most powerful functions of the human brain. It is developed from the time you are born up till you die. Its one of the few things that actually improves as you get older. Even into old age and it is very important for humans to be able to discern faces.
The advertising industry has used our pre-disposition and powerful facial recognition system to program our minds. And they try to make us worship celebrities
They use these easily recognize faces that are built into our human database to get advertising messages across to us this is why we have a cult of celebrity personality and United States today.
Thereforw I don’t care how many celebrities show up at your rallies and the amount of buses used just points to a lager funded organization that helps with logistics and not people driving their own cars as individual decisions to go to or not go to a rally or protest. I can see these fake rallies in the wiki leaks and in project Veritas.